Card range issues...

Let us know what features not currently in the PT4 should be added.

Moderators: WhiteRider, kraada, Flag_Hippo, morny, Moderators

Card range issues...

Postby dutch81 » Wed Dec 02, 2015 2:15 pm

Here are 2 examples of custom notes taken using cardrange -

[T] Probe Bet T [ HU ] (OOP) - {J8o} on {3sJsJh,3sJsJh}{9h,9h} (2)
Many times, there are duplicate flops but the count is still 2 instances of this happening.

[T] Called T CB w/ weak hand, no draw - {88,55,A3o} on {AdTh9h,Qc2h4s,9s7c5s}{2d,Kc,9d} (3)
As you can see, once again, there are 3 sets of hole cards but 4 flops... it's pretty much useless b/c you never know which goes with what. I suggest having all flops and holecards next to each other for ease of determining what goes with what. I understand that would take up a lot more room but having inaccurate data is the worst case scenario. Perhaps you can add a scroll bar so we could scroll down in the pop up much like when you click a player note box.

Also, after a handful of flop cardrange notes, the placement of the cardrange and flops is extremely hard to make out since it's all over the place. They're just being stacked side by side which makes it impossible to figure out which flops and cardranges go together. They're really only good for 1 instance b/c I think the order of the cardrange and flops are incorrect much of the time. Since I multi-table, it's hard to keep track but I'll do my best to get some examples.

This is a MAJOR issue for any note using cardrange period. I have seen all kinds of errors being noted and since then, I have begun to ignore them fearing I may use incorrect data that gets me in a world of trouble. I only rely on these notes when there is only 1 instance since there's no way to mess that up or get confused. Anything over 1 instance and you're just gambling, hoping the data is correct. I suspect not too many players use the cardrange, especially post flop for custom notes and that is the reason it hasn't been brought up yet.

Just found 2 more examples...
[R] Bet 1 BB on R - {KJo} on {Kc7cJh,Qd9sTs}{5h,6c}{7h,4s} (2)
[R] Vs Missed F+T CB / Bet R Range 2H+ - {JTo} on {2cKc8c}{9d}{7s} (1)
dutch81
 
Posts: 337
Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 12:33 pm

Re: Card range issues...

Postby kraada » Wed Dec 02, 2015 3:33 pm

This is a known issue - those variables are not built to work together and so do not show in a coordinated fashion.
kraada
Moderator
 
Posts: 54430
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2008 2:32 am
Location: NY

Re: Card range issues...

Postby dutch81 » Wed Dec 02, 2015 10:02 pm

I appreciate... looks like I have a lot of work to do. Thanks again.
dutch81
 
Posts: 337
Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 12:33 pm

Re: Card range issues...

Postby dutch81 » Mon Dec 07, 2015 7:26 pm

Is there any chance you can make these work together in the future? Seems like there is a lot of potential if possible.

Other than PF situations, I can't think of any spots where you'd use cardrange.

For boards, w/o cardrange, I also can't think of any spots where this might be useful.

Can you give me some examples please?
dutch81
 
Posts: 337
Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 12:33 pm

Re: Card range issues...

Postby kraada » Tue Dec 08, 2015 8:20 am

This is a request the development team is aware of.
kraada
Moderator
 
Posts: 54430
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2008 2:32 am
Location: NY

Re: Card range issues...

Postby dutch81 » Tue Dec 08, 2015 1:49 pm

I appreciate it, thanks.
dutch81
 
Posts: 337
Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 12:33 pm


Return to PT4 Feature Requests

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest